Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/4802
Title: Air pollution perceptions and their impacts on the coal industry
Authors: Lloyd, Philip JD 
Keywords: Air pollution;Sulphur oxides;Nitrogen oxides;Flue gas desulphurization;Clean Air Amendment Act;Acid rain
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Abstract: Perceptions of disaster caused by burning fossil fuels have reached such a pitch that they seriously threaten the very future of the industry. Coal is a dirty word. A leader in Business Day (January 19 2009) claimed ‘There is no disputing that renewable and nonpolluting energy sources are preferable to the country—the true cost of so-called cheap coal-fired power stations is neither reflected nor accounted for by Eskom—the true and immediate but unacknowledged cost of continued coal mining is apparent in the catastrophic level of acidification from mining runoff of all significant natural water resources in the country—and their waters have been rendered unfit for human consumption. Air quality is in a similar state with—increases in pulmonary disease causing workforce absenteeism and compromised childhood development, among many other health problems recorded in areas polluted by coal mining.’ The upshot is that our latest coal-fired power station, Kusile, is being required to use flue gas desulphurization. The costs are considerable, and the benefits minimal. Meanwhile, exports are being threatened by EU directives and an assumption that South African coal gives off excessive quantities of SOx and NOx when burned. The industry needs to arm itself with clear responses to these and similar misconceptions, and to communicate those responses loudly and clearly, if it is to survive.
URI: http://www.saimm.co.za/Journal/v111n08p573.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/4802
Appears in Collections:Eng - Journal articles (not DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lloyd_P_Air pollution perceptions and their_pdfMain article2.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

18
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 18, 2018

Download(s)

5
checked on Oct 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons