Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/3233
Title: Questioning the pace and pathway of e-government development in Africa: a case study of South Africa’s Cape Gateway project
Authors: Maumbe, Blessing Mukabeta 
Owei, Vesper 
Alexander, Helen 
Keywords: e-Government;Development;South Africa;Cape Gateway project
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Maumbe, B.M., Owei, V. & Alexander, H. (2008). Questioning the pace and pathway of e-government development in Africa: a case study of South Africa’s Cape Gateway project. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4): 757–777
Abstract: The paper examines e-government development in Africa. This study is based on the Cape Gateway project in South Africa, a leading e-government initiative on the continent. We observe that African countries have jumped on the e-government band wagon by looking mostly at the benefits without a clear risk assessment. We argue that African countries should question the pace and pathway for their e-government programs. We caution that e-government models from developed countries do not necessarily work in Africa. E-government programs in Africa should be balanced with the provision of basic needs and infrastructure. We conclude that e-government in South Africa should adopt multi-cultural approaches, and must be underpinned by national development priorities. We recommend that the Cape Gateway must address the socio-economic context and needs of the country. The pace and pathway of its e-government must depend on the availability of both financial and human resources and also user satisfaction.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.007
ISSN: 0740-624X
Appears in Collections:FID - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Maumbe_Blessing_Mukabeta_Owei_Vesper_Alexander_Helen_FID_2008.pdfMain article231.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
Last Week
5
Last month
0
checked on Oct 22, 2018

Download(s)

25
checked on Oct 22, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.