Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFester, E-
dc.contributor.authorBayat, MS-
dc.contributor.authorDu Toit, A-
dc.contributor.authorSulayman, S-
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates a general perception amongst academics that outcomes-based education and training (OBET), together with the prescriptions around the national qualifications framework, (NQF) have an inhibiting impact on academic freedom in higher education in South Africa. It proposes an alternative view, namely that academic freedom is, in fact, greatly enhanced by the architectural design of OBET. This argument is built around the distinction between educational inputs and outputs, which represent the domains of academics and quality assurance agencies respectively. It acknowledges that freedom should be exercised within the context of national imperatives, as long as these imperatives themselves are not educationally restrictive. These views crystallise in the recognition that the right of academics to enjoy academic freedom presupposes an obligation of discretion — a phrase coined to describe the peculiar responsibilities imposed on academics by that particular educational paradigm.en_US
dc.titleAcademic freedom under outcomes-based education and training in South African higher education institutions (HEIs)en_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal of Business and Management Dynamics (JBMD)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fester_academic_jbmd_2008.pdfArticle132.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Feb 9, 2021


checked on Feb 9, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.